Network Working Group K. Tesink, Ed.
Request for Comments: 3593 Telcordia Technologies
Obsoletes: 2493 September 2003
Category: Standards Track
Textual Conventions for MIB Modules Using Performance History
Based on 15 Minute Intervals
Status of this Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved.
Abstract
This document defines a set of Textual Conventions for MIB modules
that make use of performance history data based on 15 minute
intervals.
This memo replaces RFC 2493. Changes relative to RFC 2493 are
summarized in the MIB module's REVISION clause.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ................................................. 22. Note on Invalid Data and Proxies ............................. 23. Note on xyzTimeElapsed ....................................... 34. Note on xyzValidIntervals .................................... 35. Definitions .................................................. 46. Acknowledgments .............................................. 87. References ................................................... 87.1. Normative References ................................... 87.2. Informative References ................................. 88. Security Considerations ...................................... 99. Intellectual Property Statement .............................. 910. Editor's Address ............................................. 911. Full Copyright Statement ..................................... 10
Tesink Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 3593 15 Minute Based Performance History TCs September 2003
In cases where a manager must obtain performance history data about
the behavior of equipment it manages, several strategies can be
followed in the design of a MIB that represents the managed
equipment, including:
0 The agent counts events on a continuous basis and, whenever
desired, the manager obtains the value of the event counter and
adjusts its understanding of the history of events at the agent.
0 The agent allocates events to 'buckets' where each bucket
represents an interval of time.
Telecommunications equipment often makes use of the latter strategy.
See [3][4][5][7][8] for examples. In particular, for this equipment
it is common that history data is maintained by the agent in terms of
fifteen minute intervals.
This memo does not attempt to compare the relative merits of
different strategies used to obtain history data. Differences may
include polling policy, the amount of management traffic between
manager and agent, agent simplicity, and 'data currentness' of the
data obtained by the manager. MIB designers should consider these
aspects when choosing a particular strategy in a MIB design.
Instead, this memo provides definitions that can be used in MIB
modules that require history data based on fifteen minute intervals.
When designing a MIB module, it is often useful to define new types
similar to those defined in the SMI [2]. In comparison to a type
defined in the SMI, each of these new types has a different name, a
similar syntax, but more precise semantics. These newly defined
types are termed textual conventions, and are used for the
convenience of humans reading the MIB module. This is done through
Textual Conventions as defined in RFC 2579 [1]. It is the purpose of
this document to define the set of textual conventions to be used
when performance history based on 15 minute intervals is kept. The
performance history textual conventions defined in this memo are
based on 32 bit counts. For high capacity performance history counts
see [9].
In this document, the word proxy indicates an application which
receives SNMP messages and replies to them on behalf of the devices
where the actual implementation resides, e.g., DS3/E3 interfaces.
The proxy will have already collected the information about the
DS3/E3 interfaces into its local database and may not necessarily
Tesink Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 3593 15 Minute Based Performance History TCs September 2003
forward requests to the actual DS3/E3 interface. It is expected in
such an application that there are periods of time where the proxy is
not communicating with the DS3/E3 interfaces. In these instances,
the proxy will not necessarily have up-to-date configuration
information, and will most likely have missed the collection of some
data. Missed data collection may result in some intervals in the
interval table being unavailable.
While xyzTimeElapsed is defined as having a maximum, there may be
cases (e.g., an adjustment in the system's time-of-day clock) where
the actual value of the current interval would exceed this maximum
value.
Suppose that an agent which aligns its 15-minute measurement
intervals to 15-minute time-of-day ("wall clock") boundaries has a
time-of-day clock that systematically gains time, and that a manager
periodically corrects the clock by setting it back.
It is assumed that the agent's time-of-day clock is reasonably
accurate, say within a few seconds per day. Thus, the manager's
periodic clock adjustments will normally be small, and if done
frequently enough, need not ever exceed 10 seconds. In this case,
all interval durations will be within the allowed tolerance and none
need be marked invalid, _if_ the ANSI procedure of ending measurement
intervals at 15-minute time-of-day boundaries is followed [6].
If the time-of-day clock is systematically adjusted in small
increments, then always ending measurement intervals at 15-minute
time-of-day boundaries will result, in the long term, in the correct
number of intervals with the correct average duration, irrespective
of whether the clock is moved ahead or moved back. Thus, if for some
reason, such as an adjustment in the system's time-of-day clock, the
current interval exceeds the maximum value, it is considered
acceptable that the agent will return the maximum value.
The overall constraint on <n> is 1 =< n =< 96. Any additional
constraints on n must be defined in the DESCRIPTION clause (e.g., see
[5]).
Tesink Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 3593 15 Minute Based Performance History TCs September 2003
PerfHist-TC-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
IMPORTS
MODULE-IDENTITY,
Gauge32, mib-2
FROM SNMPv2-SMI
TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
FROM SNMPv2-TC;
perfHistTCMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
LAST-UPDATED "200308130000Z"
ORGANIZATION "IETF AToM MIB WG"
CONTACT-INFO
"WG charter:
http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/atommib-charter.html
Mailing Lists:
General Discussion: atommib@research.telcordia.com
To Subscribe: atommib-request@research.telcordia.com
Editor: Kaj Tesink
Postal: Telcordia Technologies
331 Newman Springs Road
Red Bank, NJ 07701
USA
Tel: +1 732 758 5254
E-mail: kaj@research.telcordia.com"
DESCRIPTION
"This MIB Module provides Textual Conventions
to be used by systems supporting 15 minute
based performance history counts.
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003).
This version of this MIB module is part of
RFC 3593; see the RFC itself for full
legal notices."
REVISION "200308130000Z"
DESCRIPTION
"Contact information and references updated.
No technical changes have been applied.
Published as RFC 3593."
REVISION "199811071100Z"
DESCRIPTION
"The RFC 2493 version of this MIB module."
::= { mib-2 58 }
Tesink Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 3593 15 Minute Based Performance History TCs September 2003
-- The Textual Conventions defined below are organized
-- alphabetically
-- Use of these TCs assumes the following:
-- 0 The agent supports 15 minute based history
-- counters.
-- 0 The agent is capable of keeping a history of n
-- intervals of 15 minute performance data. The
-- value of n is defined by the specific MIB
-- module but shall be 0 < n =< 96.
-- 0 The agent may optionally support performance
-- data aggregating the history intervals.
-- 0 The agent will keep separate tables for the
-- current interval, the history intervals, and
-- the total aggregates.
-- 0 The agent will keep the following objects.
-- If performance data is kept for multiple instances
-- of a measured entity, then
-- these objects are applied to each instance of
-- the measured entity (e.g., interfaces).
--
-- xyzTimeElapsed OBJECT-TYPE
-- SYNTAX INTEGER (0..899)
-- MAX-ACCESS read-only
-- STATUS current
-- DESCRIPTION
-- "The number of seconds that have elapsed since
-- the beginning of the current measurement period.
-- If, for some reason, such as an adjustment in the
-- system's time-of-day clock, the current interval
-- exceeds the maximum value, the agent will return
-- the maximum value."
-- ::= { xxx }
-- xyzValidIntervals OBJECT-TYPE
-- SYNTAX INTEGER (0..<n>)
-- MAX-ACCESS read-only
-- STATUS current
-- DESCRIPTION
-- "The number of previous near end intervals
-- for which data was collected.
-- [ The overall constraint on <n> is 1 =< n =< 96; ]
-- [ Define any additional constraints on <n> here. ]
-- The value will be <n> unless the measurement was
-- (re-)started within the last (<n>*15) minutes, in which
-- case the value will be the number of complete 15
-- minute intervals for which the agent has at least
-- some data. In certain cases (e.g., in the case
Tesink Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 3593 15 Minute Based Performance History TCs September 2003
-- where the agent is a proxy) it is possible that some
-- intervals are unavailable. In this case, this
-- interval is the maximum interval number for
-- which data is available."
-- ::= { xxx }
-- xyzInvalidIntervals OBJECT-TYPE
-- SYNTAX INTEGER (0..<n>)
-- MAX-ACCESS read-only
-- STATUS current
-- DESCRIPTION
-- "The number of intervals in the range from
-- 0 to xyzValidIntervals for which no
-- data is available. This object will typically
-- be zero except in cases where the data for some
-- intervals are not available (e.g., in proxy
-- situations)."
-- ::= { xxx }
PerfCurrentCount ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A counter associated with a
performance measurement in a current 15
minute measurement interval. The value
of this counter starts from zero and is
increased when associated events occur,
until the end of the 15 minute interval.
At that time the value of the counter is
stored in the first 15 minute history
interval, and the CurrentCount is
restarted at zero. In the
case where the agent has no valid data
available for the current interval the
corresponding object instance is not
available and upon a retrieval request
a corresponding error message shall be
returned to indicate that this instance
does not exist (for example, a noSuchName
error for SNMPv1 and a noSuchInstance for
SNMPv2 GET operation)."
SYNTAX Gauge32
Tesink Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 3593 15 Minute Based Performance History TCs September 2003
PerfIntervalCount ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A counter associated with a
performance measurement in a previous
15 minute measurement interval. In the
case where the agent has no valid data
available for a particular interval the
corresponding object instance is not
available and upon a retrieval request
a corresponding error message shall be
returned to indicate that this instance
does not exist (for example, a noSuchName
error for SNMPv1 and a noSuchInstance for
SNMPv2 GET operation).
In a system supporting
a history of n intervals with
IntervalCount(1) and IntervalCount(n) the
most and least recent intervals
respectively, the following applies at
the end of a 15 minute interval:
- discard the value of IntervalCount(n)
- the value of IntervalCount(i) becomes that
of IntervalCount(i-1) for n >= i > 1
- the value of IntervalCount(1) becomes that
of CurrentCount
- the TotalCount, if supported, is adjusted."
SYNTAX Gauge32
PerfTotalCount ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A counter associated with a
performance measurements aggregating the
previous valid 15 minute measurement
intervals. (Intervals for which no valid
data was available are not counted)"
SYNTAX Gauge32
END
Tesink Standards Track [Page 7]
RFC 3593 15 Minute Based Performance History TCs September 2003
This document is a product of the AToM MIB Working Group. The editor
would like to acknowledge Mike Heard for his many valuable
contributions to this memo.
[1] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J., Rose,
M. and S. Waldbusser, "Textual Conventions for SMIv2", STD 58,
RFC 2579, April 1999.
[2] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J., Rose,
M. and S. Waldbusser, "Structure of Management Information
Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58, RFC 2578, April 1999.
[3] Fowler, D., "Definitions of Managed Objects for the DS1, E1, DS2
and E2 Interface Types", RFC 2495, January 1999.
[4] Fowler, D., "Definitions of Managed Objects for the DS3/E3
Interface Type", RFC 2496, January 1999.
[5] Tesink, K., "Definitions of Managed Objects for the Synchronous
Optical Network/Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SONET/SDH)
Interface Type", RFC 3592, September 2003.
[6] American National Standard for Telecommunications - Digital
Hierarchy - Layer 1 In-Service Digital Transmission Performance
Monitoring, ANSI T1.231-1997, September 1997.
[7] Bathrick, G. and F. Ly, "Definitions of Managed Objects for the
ADSL Lines", RFC 2662, August 1999.
[8] Ray, B., and R. Abbi, "Definitions of Managed Objects for High
Bit-Rate DSL - 2nd generation (HDSL2) and Single-Pair High-Speed
Digital Subscriber Line (SHDSL) Lines", RFC 3276, May 2002.
[9] Ray, B. and R. Abbi, "High Capacity Textual Conventions for MIB
Modules Using Performance History Based on 15 Minute Intervals",
Work in Progress.
Tesink Standards Track [Page 8]
RFC 3593 15 Minute Based Performance History TCs September 2003
This memo defines textual conventions for use in other MIB modules.
Security issues for these MIB modules are addressed in the memos
defining those modules.
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it
has made any effort to identify any such rights. Information on the
IETF's procedures with respect to rights in standards-track and
standards-related documentation can be found in BCP-11. Copies of
claims of rights made available for publication and any assurances of
licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to
obtain a general license or permission for the use of such
proprietary rights by implementors or users of this specification can
be obtained from the IETF Secretariat.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights which may cover technology that may be required to practice
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF Executive
Director.
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved.
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
English.
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Tesink Standards Track [Page 10]