Network Working Group T. Howes
Request for Comments: 1249 M. Smith
B. Beecher
University of Michigan
August 1991
DIXIE Protocol Specification
Status of this Memo
This RFC defines a mechanism by which TCP/UDP based clients can
access OSI Directory Service without the overhead of the ISO
transport and presentation protocols required to implement full-blown
DAP. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It
does not specify any standard. Distribution of this memo is
unlimited.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction .............................................. 21.1 History .................................................. 22. Protocol .................................................. 22.1 Header ................................................... 32.2 Operations ............................................... 42.2.1 Read ................................................... 42.2.1.1 Read Request ......................................... 42.2.1.2 Read Reply ........................................... 42.2.2 Search ................................................. 52.2.2.1 Search Request ....................................... 52.2.2.2 Search Reply ......................................... 52.2.3 List ................................................... 52.2.3.1 List Request ......................................... 52.2.3.2 List Reply ........................................... 52.2.4 Modify ................................................. 52.2.4.1 Modify Request ....................................... 62.2.4.2 Modify Reply ......................................... 62.2.5 Modify RDN ............................................. 62.2.5.1 Modify RDN Request ................................... 62.2.5.2 Modify RDN Reply ..................................... 62.2.6 Add .................................................... 62.2.6.1 Add Request .......................................... 72.2.6.2 Add Reply ............................................ 72.2.7 Remove ................................................. 72.2.7.1 Remove Request ....................................... 72.2.7.2 Remove Reply ......................................... 72.2.8 Bind ................................................... 72.2.8.1 Bind Request ......................................... 7
Howes, Smith, & Beecher [Page 1]
RFC 1249 DIXIE August 1991
2.2.8.2 Bind Reply ........................................... 82.3 Operation Code Summary ................................... 82.4 Return Code Summary ...................................... 83. References ................................................ 94. Available Implementations ................................. 95. Security Considerations.................................... 96. Authors' Addresses ........................................ 10
OSI Directory Service defines a powerful mechanism for storing and
retrieving information about objects, and for arranging those objects
in a hierarchical structure. Many types of objects and information
can be stored in The Directory, including white pages information,
application information, service information, etc. The OSI protocol
defined to allow access to this information is the Directory Access
Protocol (DAP). The DAP, being an OSI application-layer program, is
fairly heavy-weight and requires a substantial amount of computing
power and coding investment to implement.
The DIXIE protocol is designed for use by smaller hosts (e.g.,
Macintoshes and PCs) that do not have the computing power or
necessary software to implement a full OSI protocol stack. The DIXIE
protocol is also useful for any Internet application that wants a
simple interface to X.500 that requires very little coding
investment.
The basic idea behind DIXIE is the same as that described in RFC 1202
for the Directory Assistance Protocol. DIXIE offers both UDP and TCP
access to The Directory. While the Directory Assistance Protocol
exports something of a user interface, DIXIE provides a more direct
protocol translation.
The DIXIE protocol has evolved over time, slowly growing into the
protocol described by this document. Without an understanding of the
circumstances surrounding this evolution, the wisdom of some of the
DIXIE design decisions may not be apparent.
This section describes the DIXIE protocol in detail. DIXIE follows a
client-server request and response paradigm. Clients send request
packets to a DIXIE server, and the server sends reply packets in
return. Communication may be over UDP or TCP, depending upon the
needs of the client. All modification operations (ADD, REMOVE,
MODIFY, MODIFYRDN) must be performed over a TCP connection, which
Howes, Smith, & Beecher [Page 2]
RFC 1249 DIXIE August 1991
provides some level of authentication.
Whichever method of communication is used, the general packet format
is the same. Each packet consists of a sixteen octet header followed
by some data. The format of the header and data for each kind of
request is described below.
The representation used for all X.500 data passed between the server
and the client is the QUIPU EDB format. So, for example, a
Distinguished Name might look something like "c=US@o=University of
Michigan". For a complete description of this format, see volume 5
of the ISODE Manual.
The DIXIE server listens on port 96 for both UDP packets and TCP
connections.
The DIXIE packet header is sixteen octets long. For requests, the
header is described by the following:
Start Length Description
0 1 An opcode specifying one of the operations
described below. (see section 2.3 for a summary)
1 2 A request identifier to be included in the reply.
This number should be unique to a request.
3 4 The total length of the request packet, excluding
the header.
7 2 Unused.
9 1 Options. Currently, there are only three options.
If bit 0 is set, "large" attributes will be
included in the response. The choice of what
constitutes large is up to the implementation.
If bit 1 is set, the dereference aliases service
control will be set for the X.500 operation. If
bit 2 is set, aliases will NOT be dereferenced and
searched during a search operation.
10 1 Protocol version. The current version is 1.
11 1 For the search operation, this byte specifies the
scope of the search. (see section 2.2.2.1)
12 2 Timelimit in seconds for the operation.
14 2 Sizelimit for the operation (search and list).
Howes, Smith, & Beecher [Page 3]
RFC 1249 DIXIE August 1991
For replies, the header is described by the following:
Start Length Description
0 1 A return code specifying either success or
describing any error that occurred. (see
section 2.4 for a description of each code)
1 2 The identifier included in the corresponding
request packet.
3 4 The total length of the response packet, excluding
the header.
7 3 Unused.
10 1 Protocol version. The current version is 1.
11 5 Unused.
All unused fields should be set to null octets and are reserved for
future expansion.
The header opcode should be set to 0x01. The data portion of the
packet consists of the DN of the entry to read, a null octet, and
then a null-octet separated list of attributes whose values are to be
returned from the read. If no attributes to return are listed, all
attributes are returned. The packet is terminated by two null octets
in a row.
The reply data for the read operation consists of the entry read,
followed by a null octet. An entry consists of the DN of the entry,
followed by the octet 0x02, followed by a 0x02-octet separated list
of attribute values. An attribute value consists of an attribute
type, followed by the octet 0x01, followed by a 0x01-octet separated
list of values. Each attribute type, attribute value and
distinguished name has the form defined by the QUIPU EDB format.
Howes, Smith, & Beecher [Page 4]
RFC 1249 DIXIE August 1991
The header opcode should be set to 0x0f. Octet 11 in the header
should be set to 0x01, 0x02, or 0x03, for a search scope of base
object, one level, or whole subtree, respectively. The data portion
of the packet consists of the DN of the entry from which to start the
search, a null octet, a string containing the search filter (dish-
style), a null-octet, and then a null-octet separated list of
attributes whose values are to be returned from the search. If no
attributes to return are listed, all attributes are returned. The
packet is terminated by two null octets in a row.
The reply data to the search operation consists of two octets in
network byte order specifying the number of matches returned. Next
comes this number of sequences of the form: one 0x03 octet followed
by one entry. Each entry is as described above in section 2.2.1.2.
The header opcode should be set to 0x10. The data portion of the
packet consists of the DN of the entry on which to perform the list,
followed by a null octet.
The reply data to the list operation consists of two octets in
network byte order specifying the number of subordinates returned,
followed by this number of sequences of the form: one 0x03 octet
followed by a Relative Distinguished Name of a subordinate.
The header opcode should be set to 0x02. The data portion of the
packet consists of the DN of the entry to modify, followed by a null
octet, followed by a null-separated list of modify operations to
perform. Each modify operation is one of the following:
type remove attribute type
type=value make value the sole value for attribute type
type+=value add value to attribute type
type-=value remove value from attribute type
The second form will see to it that existing values (if any) are
deleted before the new ones are added. The third form will add the
attribute type if it does not already exist. Note that the QUIPU EDB
format, used to specify value, allows multiple values to be specified
separated by the "&" character. This operation is only allowed over
TCP.
The header opcode should be set to 0x13. The data portion of the
packet consists of the DN of the entry to modify, followed by a null
octet, followed by the new RDN the entry should have, followed by a
final null octet. The old value of the RDN is never kept as an
attribute of the entry. This operation is only allowed over TCP.
The header opcode should be set to 0x11. The data portion of the
packet consists of the DN of the entry to add, followed by a null
octet, followed by a null-separated list of the entry's attributes.
Each attribute in this list has the form:
type=value
where value can consist of a single value, or multiple values
separated by the "&" character. The request is terminated by two
null octets in a row. This operation is only allowed over TCP.
The header opcode should be set to 0x12. The data portion of the
packet consists of the DN of the entry to remove, followed by a null
octet. This operation is only allowed over TCP.
The header opcode should be set to 0x04. The data portion of the
packet consists of the DN of the entry as which to bind, followed by
a null octet, followed by the password of the entry as which to bind,
followed by a final null octet. A null DN corresponds causes a bind
as NULLDN to occur.
Howes, Smith, & Beecher [Page 7]
RFC 1249 DIXIE August 1991
The format of the bind reply packet depends on whether the operation
was invoked over TCP or UDP. If the operation was invoked over TCP,
there is no reply data. Success or failure of the operation is
indicated by the return code in the packet header.
If the bind operation was invoked over UDP, the data portion of the
reply packet consists of an Internet address in standard dot
notation, followed by a 0x01 octet, followed by a decimal number (in
text form), followed by a null octet. The address and number should
be taken to be the IP address and port number to which the client
should connect to obtain an authenticated TCP connection, bound as
the entity specified in the request packet.
This section describes the possible values for the DIXIE header
operation code. There are currently 8 possible values:
0x01 Read
0x02 Modify
0x04 Bind
0x0f Search
0x10 List
0x11 Add
0x12 Remove
0x13 Modify RDN
This section describes the possible values for the the DIXIE header
return code. There are currently 17 possible values:
0x01 The request was successful.
0x02 The search did not find any matches.
0x03 Some unknown, generic DIXIE error has occurred.
0x04 The DIXIE opcode was not recognized by the DIXIE server.
0x05 Insufficient access to perform a modification.
0x06 A malformed DN was supplied.
0x07 Some time limit or size limit was reached.
Partial results will be returned.
0x08 A modify was attempted before a bind.
0x09 A fragment requested was not found.
0x0a An attribute type specified is invalid.
0x0b An attribute specified does not exist in the entry.
0x0c An attribute value specification is invalid.
0x0d An attribute value does not exist (as for removal of the
Howes, Smith, & Beecher [Page 8]
RFC 1249 DIXIE August 1991
value).
0x0e A modification of an entry's RDN was attempted via a modify
operation. This is not allowed (use modrdn instead).
0x0f A supplied DN references an invalid portion of the tree.
0x10 The DSA has passed back a referral to another DSA (as for a
modification to a non-local entry), and the DIXIE server was
unable to follow it.
0x11 The DSA is down or unreachable.
[1] Information Processing - Open Systems Interconnection - The
Directory, International Organization for Standardization,
International Standard 9594, 1988.
[2] Kille, S., Robbins, C., Roe, M., and A. Turland, "The ISO
Development Environment: User's Manual", Volume 5: QUIPU,
Performance Systems International, January 1990.
[3] Rose, M., "Directory Assistance Service", RFC 1202, Performance
Systems International, February 1991.
This section is not meant as an endorsement of any
implementation, it is provided merely as information for the
Internet community. A full Un*x-based implementation of the
DIXIE protocol in the form of a DIXIE server and DIXIE
application library is freely available for anonymous FTP from
the host terminator.cc.umich.edu in the ~ftp/x500 directory.
Un*x and Macintosh clients that use the DIXIE protocol have also
been implemented and are available from the same location.
There is also a discussion list for DIXIE-related topics called
dixie@terminator.cc.umich.edu. To join, send mail to dixie-
request@terminator.cc.umich.edu.
Tim Howes
University of Michigan
Information Technology Division
535 West William St.
Ann Arbor, MI 48103-4943
Phone: +1 313 764-2278
EMail: tim@umich.edu
Mark Smith
University of Michigan
Information Technology Division
535 West William St.
Ann Arbor, MI 48103-4943
Phone: +1 313 764-2277
EMail: mcs@umich.edu
Bryan Beecher
University of Michigan
Information Technology Division
535 West William St.
Ann Arbor, MI 48103-4943
Phone: +1 313 764-4050
EMail: bryan@umich.edu
Howes, Smith, & Beecher [Page 10]