Inserting anchors into your documents is something of an art,
requiring good writing skills, HTML/XHTML prowess, and an
architectural sense of your documents and their relationships to
others on the Web. Effective links flow seamlessly into a document,
quietly supplying additional browsing opportunities to the reader
without disturbing the current document. Poorly designed links scream
out, interrupt the flow of the source document, and generally annoy
the reader.
While there are as many linking styles as there are authors, here are
a few of the more popular ways to link your documents. All do two
things: they give the reader quick access to related information, and
they tell the reader how the link is related to the current contents.
6.4.2. Inline References
If you aren't collecting
links into lists, you're probably sprinkling them throughout
your document. So-called inline links are more in keeping with the
true spirit of hypertext, since they enable readers to mark their
current place in the document, visit the related topic in more depth
or find a better explanation, and then come back to the original and
continue reading. That's very personalized information
processing.
The biggest mistake made by novice authors, however, is to overload
their documents with links and treat them as if they are panic
buttons demanding to be pressed. You may have seen this style of
linking; HTML pages with the word "here" all over the
place, like the panic-ridden example in Figure 6-5
(we can't bring ourselves to show you the source for this
travesty).
Figure 6-5. Links should not wave and yell like first-graders, "Here! Me! Me!"
As links, phrases like "click here" and "also
available" are content-free and annoying. They make the person
who is scanning the page for an important link read all the
surrounding text to actually find the reference.
The better, more refined style for an inline link is to make every
one contain a noun or noun/verb phrase relating to the topic at hand.
Compare how kumquat farming and industry news references are treated
in Figure 6-6 to the "Here! Me! Me!"
example in Figure 6-5.
Figure 6-6. Kinder, gentler inline links work best
A quick scan of Figure 6-6 immediately yields
useful links to "kumquat farming methods" and
"kumquat industry's past ten years." There is no
need to read the surrounding text to understand where the link will
take you. Indeed, the immediately surrounding content in our example,
as for most inline links, serves only as syntactic sugar in support
of the embedded links.
Embedding links into the general discourse of a document takes more
effort to create than link lists. You've got to actually
understand the content of the current as well as the target
documents, be able to express that relationship in just a few words,
and then intelligently incorporate that link at some key place in the
source document. Hopefully this key place is where you might expect
the user is ready to interrupt their reading and ask a question or
request more information. To make matters even more difficult,
particularly for the traditional tech writer, this form of
author-reader conversation is most effective when presented in active
voice (he, she, or it does something to an object versus the object
having something done to it). The effort expended is worthwhile,
though, resulting in more informative, easily read documents.
Remember, you'll write the document once, but it will be read
thousands, if not millions, of times. Please your readers,
please.