17.6 Be an Expert on find Search Operatorsfind is admittedly tricky. Once you get a handle on its abilities, you'll learn to appreciate its trickiness. But before thinking about anything remotely tricky, let's look at a simple find command:
%
The All find commands, no matter how complicated, are really just variations on the one above. You can specify many different names, look for old files, and so on; no matter how complex, you're really only specifying a starting point, some search parameters, and what to do with the files (or directories or links or...) you find. The key to using find in a more sophisticated way is realizing that search parameters are really "logical expressions" that find evaluates. That is, find :
So, something like
Once you've gotten used to thinking this way, it's easy to use the AND, OR, NOT, and grouping operators. So let's think about a more complicated find command. Let's look for files that end in .o or .tmp AND that are more than five days old, AND print their pathnames. We want an expression that evaluates true for files whose names match either *.o OR *.tmp :
-name "*.o" -o -name "*.tmp" If either condition is true, we want to check the access time. So we put the expression above within parentheses ( quoted ( 8.14 ) with backslashes so the shell doesn't treat the parentheses as subshell operators ( 13.7 ) ). We also add a -atime operator ( 17.5 ) :
-atime +5 \( -name "*.o" -o -name "*.tmp" \) The parentheses force find to evaluate what's inside as a unit. The expression is true if "the access time is more than 5 days ago and \( either the name ends with .o or the name ends with .tmp \)." If you didn't use parentheses, the expression would mean something different:
-atime +5 -name "*.o" -o -name "*.tmp" Wrong!
When
find
sees two operators next to each other with no
-o
between,
that means AND.
So the "wrong" expression is true if "either \( the access time is more
than 5 days ago and the name ends with
.o
\) or the name ends with
.tmp
."
This incorrect expression would be true for any name ending with
.tmp
, no matter how recently the file was accessed - the
The following command, which is what we want, lists files in the current directory and subdirectories that match our criteria:
%
What if we wanted to list all files that do
not
match these
criteria? All we want is the logical inverse of this expression. The
NOT operator is
% For that matter, even -print is an expression; it always evaluates to true. So are -exec and -ok ( 17.10 ) ; they evaluate to true when the command they execute returns a zero status. (There are a few situations in which this can be used to good effect; see article 17.11 for some of those.) Article 17.12 has more about find expressions.
But before you try anything too complicated, you need to realize one
thing.
find
isn't as sophisticated as you might like it to be.
You can't squeeze all the spaces out of expressions, as if it were a
real programming language. You need spaces before and after operators
like
%
A true power user will realize that
find
is relying on the
shell to
separate the command line into meaningful chunks (
8.5
)
,
or
tokens
.
And the shell, in
turn, is assuming that tokens are separated by spaces. When
the shell gives
find
a chunk of characters like
Once you start thinking about expressions, find 's syntax ceases to be obscure - in some ways, it's even elegant. It certainly allows you to say what you need to say with reasonable efficiency. - , |
|