11.4.1. Problem

11.4.3. Discussion

If the name of a function is func, you can produce a reference to it by prefixing its name with \&. You can also dynamically allocate anonymous functions using the sub { } notation. These code references can be stored just like any other reference.

It is possible to store the name of a function in a variable, such as:

$funcname = "thefunc";
&$funcname( );

but that's not a very good solution for several reasons. First, it uses symbolic references, not real (hard) references, and so is forbidden under the use strict "refs" pragma. Symbolic references to variables are usually a bad idea, since they can't access lexical variables, only globals, and aren't reference counted. Second, as written it doesn't include package information, so if executed in a different package, it would try to call the wrong function. Finally, in the odd case that the function were redefined at some point, the symbolic reference would get whatever the current definition for the function was, whereas the hard reference would still access the old definition.

Instead of placing the name of the function in the variable, use the backslash operator to create a reference to the function. This is the normal way to store a function in a variable or pass along to another function. You can mix and match references to named functions with references to unnamed ones:

my %commands = (
    "happy" => \&joy,
    "sad"   => \&sullen,
    "done"  => sub { die "See ya!" },
    "mad"   => \&angry,
);

print "How are you? ";
chomp($string = <STDIN>);
if ($commands{$string}) {
    $commands{$string}->( );
} else {
    print "No such command: $string\n";
}

If you create an anonymous function that refers to a lexical (my) variable from an enclosing scope, reference counting ensures that the lexical variable is never deallocated so long as that function reference exists:

sub counter_maker {
    my $start = 0;
    return sub {                      # this is a closure
        return $start++;              # lexical from enclosing scope
    };
}

$counter = counter_maker( );

for ($i = 0; $i < 5; $i ++) {
    print &$counter, "\n";
}

Even though counter_maker has ended and $start gone out of scope, Perl doesn't free the variable, because the anonymous subroutine referenced by $counter still has a reference to $start. If we call counter_maker again, it'll return another, different anonymous subroutine reference that uses a different $start:

$counter1 = counter_maker( );
$counter2 = counter_maker( );

for ($i = 0; $i < 5; $i ++) {
    print &$counter1, "\n";
}

print &$counter1, " ", &$counter2, "\n";

1
2
3
4
5 0

Another use for closures is function generators, that is, functions that create and return brand-new functions. The counter_maker function is such a function generator. Here's another simple one:

sub timestamp {
    my $start_time = time( );
    return sub { return time( ) - $start_time };
}
$early = timestamp( );
sleep 20;
$later = timestamp( );
sleep 10;
printf "It's been %d seconds since early.\n", $early->( );
printf "It's been %d seconds since later.\n", $later->( );
It's been 30 seconds since early.
It's been 10 seconds since later.

Each call to timestamp generates and returns a brand-new function. The timestamp function creates a lexical called $start_time that contains the current clock time (in epoch seconds). Every time that closure is called, it returns how many seconds have elapsed since it was created by subtracting its starting time from the current time.

11.4.4. See Also