2.2 Using Effective Coding Style for PackagesA package is a collection of PL/SQL elements, including data structures (from cursors to constants) and program units (procedures and functions). Packages are generally the most complicated and extended pieces of code PL/SQL developers will write. To make matters worse, the current array of PL/SQL development environments do not offer any tools for viewing and managing a package as a collection. A package is treated and presented no differently from a single function -- just a whole bunch of lines of source code. As a result, it is up to you to design and write your package to make it as readable and maintainable as possible. There are two fundamental strategies you can employ to help meet this objective: Strategy 1: Use all available techniques to make your code as clean, modular, and structured as possible. Strategy 2: Come up with a consistent coding style and format for your packages -- and get people to follow that style. Many of the other best practices covered in this chapter address the first strategy -- which is clearly the more important and difficult of the two. In this section, I suggest elements of a coding style for packages. It is absolutely critical that you adopt an effective coding style and employ it consistently. This style should be compatible, of course, with the style you use throughout your PL/SQL code. It should also, however, include components that reflect and support the structure and significance of the package. The most basic elements of a package style are, first of all, no different from the style I encourage for all other kinds of PL/SQL code. These elements include:
The style elements I find valuable particularly for packages include the following:
The best way to demonstrate these coding styles is to show you the template I use for package construction. I have been writing a lot of PL/SQL code in the past year and I found myself typing the same words and phrases over and over again. To improve my productivity and also the consistency of my code, I built a package called PLVgen to generate PL/SQL programs (see Chapter 15, PLVvu: Viewing Source Code and Compile Errors ). Example 2.1 shows the basic template of a package generated with PLVgen.
Example 2.1: A Generated Package TemplateSQL> exec PLVgen.pkg('emp_maint'); 1 CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE emp_maint 2 /* 3 || Program: emp_maint 4 || Author: Steven Feuerstein 5 || File: emp_maint.SQL 6 || Created: APR 13, 1996 18:56:59 7 */ 8 /*HELP 9 Add help text here... 10 HELP*/ 11 12 /*EXAMPLES 13 Add help text here... 14 EXAMPLES*/ 15 16 IS 17 /* Public Data Structures */ 18 19 /* Public Programs */ 20 21 PROCEDURE help (context_in IN VARCHAR2 := NULL); 22 23 END emp_maint; 24 / 25 26 CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE BODY emp_maint 27 IS 28 /* Private Data Structures */ 29 30 /* Private Programs */ 31 32 /* Public Programs */ 33 34 PROCEDURE help (context_in IN VARCHAR2 := NULL) 35 IS 36 BEGIN 37 PLVhlp.show ('s:emp_maint', context_in); 38 END help; 39 END emp_maint; 40 / There are several features I would like to highlight in my package template:
The emp_maint package shown in Example 2.1 contains the most important elements of a package's "look and feel." All elements declared in the specification are indented in from the package definition statement. They exist within the context of the package, and that relationship is made clear through the indentation. The same rule holds true in the package body (you can see this with the definition of the help procedure). The banner comment lines, on the other hand, are left-justified to match the margin of the package itself. I do this to make sure that these boundary markers stand out as you scan the code. The banners identifying the different sections become very critical when the package is full of many different elements and runs to hundreds or thousands of lines. They also provide an internal guide during development. As you write a new package program, you may find that you need to create another private variable or private function. If you have the banners in place, you can easily perform a search and then drop this new element into its rightful spot. The alternative (throwing the code in at whatever point of the package you happen to be coding) results in a very chaotic package that is difficult to follow and maintain. As I make clear in the way I created Example 2.1 , you can use PLVgen.pkg to generate a package with this (or a modified) format. 2.2.1 Choosing the Order of ElementsAs with the declaration sections of procedures and functions, you must (both in the package specification and body) declare all variables and data structures before you declare any program units. But what about the order of these program units themselves? As you can see from my banners, I always try to define all my private modules before any of my public modules. These are the building blocks used by the public programs. I group them together so they are easier to locate. Is this ordering strictly necessary? Yes and no. Yes, you must define a private program before it is referenced by another program in the package (public or private). No, you do not have to group them together. You could instead define all private modules just before they are used by their public counterparts. This can make sense if the private program is only used by a single public program. If it is shared by many public programs (or other private ones, for that matter), then this placement does not accurately reflect its role in the package. You can, by the way, place the definitions of the public program units anywhere in the package body (after the variable declarations) -- even after they are referenced by another program. How is this possible? Since their headers have already been established in the package specification, the PL/SQL compiler has all the information it needs to resolve the reference. Copyright (c) 2000 O'Reilly & Associates. All rights reserved. |
|