RFC index | STD index | BCP index | FYI index
Plain text | gzipped plain text | A4 postscript | A4 postscript, 2 up | A4 postscript, 4 up
NETWORK WORKING GROUP Jim White Request for Comments #132 UCSB NIC #6708 April 28, 1971 TYPOGRAPHICAL ERROR IN RFC 107 ______________________________ On page 5 of RFC 107, at the end of the section titled 'V. Flow Control', the partial sentence: Each of these numbers is interpreted as "the number of 128ths of the current allocation" to be returned if it is in the range zero to 128... should read: ...if it is the range of zero to 127,... --- That is, return al the appropriate allocation if and only if the high-order of the left-most bit of the corresponding fraction is 1. [ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ] [ into the online RFC archives by Mohnish Harisinganey 5/97 ] [Page 1]