background image
Scenario 8-1 Answers 247
Scenario Answers
The answers provided in this section are not necessarily the only possible correct answers. They
merely represent one possibility for each scenario. The intention is to test your base knowledge
and understanding of the concepts discussed in this chapter.
Should your answers be different (as they likely will be), consider the differences. Are your
answers in line with the concepts of the answers provided and explained here? If not, go back
and read the chapter again, focusing on the sections related to the problem scenario.
Scenario 8-1 Answers
1
Because the x25 pvc command is not specified and the x25 ltc and x25 htc parameters are
specified, this is a SVC implementation.
2
Yes, there will be problems. The Dallas router has mapped its own IP address to the next
hop X.121 address and the X.25 SVC ranges do not match. The SVC ranges must be
identical on both sides.
3
Examples 8-8 and 8-9 correct issues with the existing configurations in Examples 8-6
and 8-7:
Example 8-8
Corrected Dallas Configuration for Scenario 8-1
interface ethernet 0
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
interface serial 0
encapuslation x25
ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0
x25 address 3102145551212
x25 map ip 192.168.2.
2 3104085553434 broadcast
x25 ltc 10
x25 htc 100
Example 8-9
Corrected San Jose Configuration for Scenario 8-1
interface ethernet 0
ip address 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.0
interface serial 0
encapuslation x25
ip address 192.168.2.2 255.255.255.0
x25 address 3104085553434
x25 map ip 192.168.2.1 3102145551212 broadcast
x25 ltc 10
x25 htc 100